Categories
Uncategorized

How Does an AI Detector Work and Can You Outsmart It?

Did you use a little AI help in writing your academic paper? Watch out, because an AI detector could flag your work.

More and more universities are using AI detectors to find out whether you’ve secretly involved AI tools like ChatGPT, JenniAI, or Paperpal in your writing process.

Sometimes, though, these detectors flag your work even if you didn’t use any AI at all!

No need to panic just yet and fear handing in your paper. In this article, I’ll show you 7 secret tips to help you avoid triggering an AI detector and make your texts look more human.

What is an AI Detector and How Does it Work?

More and more students are using AI tools like ChatGPT to help them with their writing.

Sure, universities could just stop using papers as a form of assessment. But since universities aren’t too keen on changing their exam formats, and papers are actually useful for learning how to do academic work, another solution is needed.

Enter AI detectors, which try to figure out whether parts of your paper were written by an AI or if you toiled over them yourself. Naturally, universities are also jumping on this bandwagon and using these tools to assess academic work.

These detectors use algorithms to check if your paper shows patterns typical of AI-generated texts.

Because AIs tend to use certain sentence structures and phrases that people wouldn’t normally use. They also check for logic. AI outputs are often just too perfectly structured, and everything feels a bit “too smooth.”

Let’s say your text stands out in one of these areas. Then the AI detector goes off. And that could make your supervisor suspicious.

At my university, for example, AI detectors aren’t allowed to be used as “proof” of an attempt to cheat.

Still, every submission goes through Turnitin, a plagiarism detection software that now also includes an AI detector. As a supervisor, I then get a score that indicates how likely it is that AI was used. What I do with that information is up to me.

Unfortunately, some detectors flag texts even if no AI was used.

So, it’d be helpful to know how to make sure your academic work doesn’t even raise suspicion in the first place.

And here’s how you can do that.

7 Secret Tips Against AI Detectors

ai detector 1

#1 No Copy & Paste

Sounds obvious, but trust me—I’ve seen it all.

Don’t just copy texts directly from an AI tool and paste them into your work!

Sure, it’s super tempting to use copy & paste and have a chapter written in seconds.

Don’t do it.

What universities will do more and more is simply ask you about a specific part of your paper. If you don’t know the sources you’ve cited or can’t answer a simple question about “your” text, your grade will tank fast.

So feel free to use AI to get creative and generate ideas, but always rewrite the text yourself. What would be great, too, is paraphrasing your SELF-written text with AI to improve grammar and sentence structure.

That brings us to tip number two.

#2 Use Synonyms and Change Sentence Structure

Let’s say you’ve hit a writing block and just can’t move forward. So you let AI inspire you.

It happens to the best of us. Oops.

To avoid having AI-generated text sneak into your paper, you should at least change the sentence structure and use synonyms.

AI detectors can recognize sentence patterns commonly found in AI-generated texts. So, if you completely restructure your sentences, you make it harder for the AI detector to identify these patterns.

You can practice this by creating multiple variations of a sentence. Practice makes perfect here too. At first, it might be difficult, but eventually, you’ll be able to rewrite sentences quickly and easily.

After rewriting several sentences, it’s worth reading through the text to make sure everything feels coherent.

ai detector 2

#3 Make Your Text More Human

As mentioned before, AI-generated texts often sound too good to be true. This is largely because AI uses very formal and precise language. That’s why AI detectors flag texts that are too smooth and flawless. Avoid this by trying to use a more human tone and vocabulary.

The beauty of academic writing doesn’t come from perfection but from originality. An AI can’t achieve that because it always uses the word that’s most likely to fit next.

Riemer and Peter (2024) from the University of Sydney call them “style engines.” This means generative AI is very good at mimicking a style—and that’s exactly the problem. True originality can’t come from that.

By incorporating the unpredictable into your text, you make it original and prevent an AI detector from being triggered.

#4 Keep “Higher-Level Thinking” to Yourself

AI tools often cram a lot of facts into a short section and sometimes sound generic because of it. This is another reason why AI detectors flag texts.

So avoid overloading your text with too many facts or information. Instead of just explaining the bare facts, keep it brief. An academic paper isn’t a Wikipedia article, it’s an argument that unfolds gradually.

For example, you could include a theoretical perspective to look at a topic from a new angle.

An AI would only come up with that if you fed it the idea. So as long as higher-level thinking remains your responsibility, you’re on safe ground.

Let’s say you’re writing a paper on digital transformation in the service sector.

You could just describe the topic and the related literature. An AI could do that too—so don’t expect a top grade here.

But if you come up with the original idea to analyze your topic through the lens of French pragmatism, like Boltanski and Thévenot (1991), then you’re about to create an original piece of work.

Meanwhile, your classmates might use ChatGPT to churn out a paper in 30 minutes and spend the rest of the day watching Netflix.

But who do you think will know more after graduation?

If you dig into Boltanski and Thévenot (1991) and use your paper as a chance to grow intellectually, you’ve already won.

It’s about resisting the quick AI solution and investing in work that truly helps you move forward.

#5 Avoid Low-Quality Sources

Sure, you can use ChatGPT or other AI tools for research. For example, the tool Consensus is super helpful for finding suitable sources.

However, you shouldn’t just blindly trust the information. AI tools often give useful summaries and explanations, but they don’t rely on primary scientific sources. To ensure the facts are correct, cross-check the AI’s info with other sources. Use reliable sources like books, scholarly articles, or databases.

At the same time, AI might give you a source that actually exists but is from an MDPI-published journal. These are often poorly peer-reviewed and therefore highly questionable.

I would never cite such an article, and I’d grade a paper relying on such sources more harshly.

For you, this means you need to develop the ability to differentiate between good and bad sources. AI can’t do this—yet—and it’s a risk for the quality of your academic work!

#6 Know the Difference Between Support and Plagiarism

In my opinion, AI is here to stay. Learning to use tools like ChatGPT properly will be an essential skill in the future job market. That’s why I don’t think you should avoid using AI entirely in your studies.

Instead, you should start using these tools right now—just in a smart way.

Many universities agree and allow AI use, but you must be transparent about how and to what extent you used it.

It’s perfectly fine to use AI tools as a support—even for academic writing. See AI as your creative assistant, helping you develop your ideas and structure your thoughts—not as a tool that writes your entire paper for you.

I’ve already made a detailed video on AI and plagiarism, which you can find linked here.

However, AI detectors work differently than plagiarism scanners. If you use AI to paraphrase, the plagiarism scanner won’t go off, but the AI detector likely will.

So, if you want to use AI for paraphrasing or spell check, just get your supervisor’s approval. Then, write a statement disclosing this in your affidavit at the end of your paper, and you won’t have to worry about AI detectors again.

Of course, this only works if your university’s exam regulations don’t explicitly prohibit AI use. So check your university’s current AI policy beforehand.

#7 Use an AI Detector Yourself

A final tip: Before submitting your paper, run it through various AI detectors or plagiarism scanners. There are several online tools now that can detect if your text might be flagged as AI-generated.

You can test an AI detector yourself and play around with it.

If you want to try it out, for example, you can use Quillbot’s free AI detector: https://quillbot.com/ai-content-detector.

Test your own text, the AI-generated text, and something in between. You’ll be able to spot patterns and see how changes affect the score.

This knowledge will help you when writing your academic paper and applying the previous 6 tips!

Conclusion

AI detectors have become really good at spotting patterns in AI-generated texts. But they’re not infallible.

In English, you’d call this an “arms race”: AI detectors and AI tools constantly push each other forward, with one always trying to stay a step ahead of the other.

This is why no student will fail an exam solely because of an AI detector. Sure, plagiarism can be definitively proven, as that’s relatively easy to verify.

That said, this doesn’t apply to AI-generated content. There will always be some doubt. Someone could simply have a writing style that’s a lot like a generative AI tool’s. There’s no surefire way to prove a text was generated by AI.

But I can’t stress this enough: if you use AI, don’t shut off your own thinking.

Instead, think of AI as a tool that makes things easier, giving you more space for genuine creative thought. But you really have to use that space—and not waste the time you save on something else. Only then will AI help you study more effectively than people could 10 years ago, allowing you to produce truly original work.

Categories
Uncategorized

Bloom’s Taxonomy: The Secret Formula for Top Grades!

Have you ever wondered why some students seem to ace every exam with an A, while others, despite intense studying, barely scrape by with a C? The secret might just lie in how they use Bloom’s Taxonomy to approach their studying.

The key to successful learning isn’t just how much time you spend with your books but how smartly you use that time.

And this is where Bloom’s Taxonomy comes in—a super useful tool that teachers use – but if you know it too, it can help you improve your study strategies and boost your grades.

Basics of Bloom’s Taxonomy

Let’s start with the basics. Bloom’s Taxonomy was developed in 1956 by Benjamin Bloom and his colleagues.

Their goal was to create a classification of learning objectives that covers different levels of thinking. This classification consists of six levels: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating.

Originally, the taxonomy was designed for educators to help them clearly define learning goals and assess student progress.

Nowadays, modern exam software and learning management systems (LMS) are increasingly incorporating features to sort and analyze questions according to the different levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Great, but why should this matter to you?

In many university exams, questions are designed to cover a range of cognitive skills, as described in Bloom’s Taxonomy.

By understanding these different levels, you can better prepare for the various types of questions you’ll face in your exams. You’ll know exactly what’s expected to score full points when you see a particular keyword in the question.

The number of points awarded typically depends on the type of question. A question that tests factual knowledge (like multiple-choice) will usually be worth fewer points than one that asks you to apply knowledge (like a case study).

And if you take a closer look at the taxonomy, it becomes clear why you didn’t get that top grade in your last exam, even though you spent hours memorizing the entire script!

For example, if you only memorized facts, you’ve only covered the lower levels of the taxonomy. In a task like, “Describe the basic principles of…,” you’re only asked for knowledge.

But when a question says, “Apply the principles of… to example X and explain…,” then you’re dealing with higher levels of the taxonomy, and simply recalling facts won’t cut it.

When you see keywords like “describe, explain, apply,” you’ll know how profs structure their exams, what the expectations for top marks are, and you can tailor your exam prep and study techniques accordingly.

The Six Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy

1. Remember

The first level is about recalling facts and basic information. In exams, these questions are often multiple-choice or short-answer questions that test simple factual knowledge. They check whether you’ve memorized basic info. You’ll need this as the foundation for deeper questions and analysis. To prepare for these types of questions, flashcards are an effective tool. Regular repetition is also crucial—schedule fixed times in your study plan to revisit and solidify what you’ve learned.

Example exam questions:

  • Define the term “photosynthesis.”
  • Name the four basic principles of bioethics according to Beauchamp and Childress.
blooms taxonomy

2. Understand

The next level is understanding. Here, it’s about grasping the meaning of information and being able to explain it in your own words. Exam questions might ask you to explain concepts or clarify the significance of theories. To prep for understanding questions, discuss concepts with your classmates. Explain the concepts to each other in your own words. This deepens your understanding and helps clear up any confusion. Paraphrasing is also helpful—try summarizing complex texts in your own words. Creating concept maps or mind maps that show the relationships between different ideas can also help. This visual representation helps you grasp the bigger picture and understand how everything fits together.

Example exam questions:

  • Explain how photosynthesis works in your own words.
  • Explain the difference between microeconomic and macroeconomic models.

3. Apply

These questions test whether you can apply your theoretical knowledge in practical situations. They might ask you to apply theories and concepts to real-world problems, often using case studies or practical tasks. To prepare for application questions, regularly work on practice problems that challenge you to apply what you’ve learned in new contexts. Or look for case studies that deal with similar problems as those discussed in class and practice analyzing them.

Example exam questions:

  • Use a SWOT analysis to assess the strengths and weaknesses of a real company of your choice.
  • Apply the concept of Nash equilibrium to analyze the strategic behavior of two competing firms.
blooms taxonomy 1

4. Analyze

Analyzing involves breaking down information and understanding the relationships between the parts. These questions often require in-depth analysis of texts, data, or theories. They test your critical thinking and ability to dissect complex information. You can practice this by reading academic papers and understanding their argument structures. Or look at how data and statistics are analyzed and interpreted. You could also create argument chains to sharpen your analytical skills.

Example exam questions:

  • Analyze the argument structure in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and evaluate the validity of his conclusions.
  • Compare the various theories of personality development.

5. Evaluate

Evaluating means making judgments about the value and quality of information or methods. Exam questions might ask you to compare and assess different theories or models. Prepare for this by writing critical essays where you compare different theories or models. You can also create evaluation rubrics to assess your own work and that of your peers. Through peer review processes, you can evaluate others’ work and provide feedback.

Example exam questions:

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the European Central Bank’s current monetary policy in the context of post-COVID-19 economic recovery.
  • Critique the methodology and conclusions of the study on the effectiveness of online learning compared to in-person instruction.
blooms taxonomy 2

6. Create

The highest level, creating, involves combining elements to develop something new and original. Exam questions at this level might ask you to formulate hypotheses or develop creative solutions to problems. Use techniques like brainstorming or mind mapping to develop new ideas. You could even participate in projects to work on your creative skills.

Example exam questions:

  • Develop a research plan to study the long-term effects of microplastics on marine ecosystems.
  • Design an innovative business model for a start-up.

Exam Prep with Bloom’s Taxonomy

So, how can you effectively use Bloom’s Taxonomy for your exam prep?

First, it helps you clearly and systematically define your learning goals. For example, when preparing for an exam, you can organize your study objectives according to the six levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Start with memorizing basic facts (Remembering), then work your way through understanding the concepts (Understanding), and apply what you’ve learned in practice problems (Applying). Next, analyze complex problems (Analyzing), evaluate different solutions (Evaluating), and finally, develop new ideas or projects (Creating). This approach makes your studying more efficient and prepares you perfectly for exams.

Check out my YouTube channel for tutorials on different study techniques. Match them to the levels of the taxonomy: Spaced repetition for remembering. Active recall for remembering and understanding. Inquiry-based learning for analyzing and evaluating. The Feynman technique for applying. Design thinking for creating, and so on.

By using Bloom’s Taxonomy, you can target your preparation for different types of exam questions and optimize your study strategies.

This structured approach not only leads to better grades but also a deeper understanding and higher competence in your field.

By systematically working through this process, you’ll be fully prepared for exams, ace them, and be able to use your knowledge flexibly afterward.

Conclusion – Blooms Taxonomy

Bloom’s Taxonomy shows that deep and lasting learning involves multiple levels that go beyond just memorizing information.

In short, a deep understanding and the ability to apply and evaluate knowledge lead to better exam performance and top grades.

It’s about mastering knowledge and being able to use it flexibly, rather than just memorizing it temporarily.

Of course, there are exceptions. Some exams mainly test factual knowledge. Medical students in their first semester might know this all too well. In these cases, exams are 90% multiple-choice, and they “cross off” answers like there’s no tomorrow.

But now you have the ability to mentally run any kind of exam through the lens of Bloom’s Taxonomy and prepare yourself laser-focused based on that.

This puts you ahead of 99% of others.

Categories
Research Methods

PRISMA Literature Review (Flow Chart & Example)

Are you planning to conduct a systematic literature review and want to follow the PRISMA protocol for this?

It’s easier than you think!

In this article, I’ll explain what PRISMA is and show you exactly how you can apply it in your own literature review.

What is a PRISMA Literature Review?

PRISMA stands for “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.” It’s a guideline developed to improve the process and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

These literature-based papers are particularly valuable because they summarize the findings of many individual studies, providing a more comprehensive picture of a topic.

The PRISMA guidelines offer a standardized framework that ensures all important aspects of a systematic review are reported transparently and completely. This includes describing the search strategy, the criteria for selecting studies, the method for data extraction, and the assessment of study quality.

One important point is that PRISMA does not provide specific instructions on how to conduct the systematic review itself.

It does not include detailed steps for what databases to select or, how to analyze the data. These tasks fall under the methodology of the systematic review and are a bit dependent on your field. Therefore, you need to come up with your own analysis method and combine it with PRISMA.

However, PRISMA helps guide you through the systematic search process step by step and documents it thoroughly.

The Goals of PRISMA

The main goals of PRISMA are:

  • Transparency: Ensuring that your search strategy is clearly and thoroughly described so that other researchers can replicate and verify your study.
  • Completeness: All relevant information must be reported to give readers a full picture of your literature search.
  • Comparability: By standardizing the reporting, it becomes easier to compare and evaluate different systematic reviews.

You can find a complete overview here: https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020.

When following the PRISMA guidelines, always make sure to cite the original source that contains the most recent version of the guidelines. The current version is PRISMA 2020. Here’s the complete reference for the PRISMA 2020 guidelines:

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372.

What is the PRISMA Flow Chart?

The PRISMA flow chart, also sometimes called the PRISMA diagram, is a chart that shows how studies are selected for a systematic review.

It consists of four main phases:

  1. Identification: You search databases and other sources for studies and record the total number of studies found.
  2. Screening: You review the titles and abstracts of the studies and filter out those that are not relevant.
  3. Eligibility: You read the full text of the remaining studies and exclude those that do not fit your criteria.
  4. Inclusion: The final group of studies that will be included in your literature review or meta-analysis remains.

The PRISMA diagram helps you document the selection process clearly and ensures that nothing important is overlooked.

In the methods section of your paper, you should mention that your systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines.

By explicitly mentioning PRISMA in the methodology section, you ensure that readers (and your supervisor) recognize and (hopefully) appreciate the structured approach of your systematic review.

Implementing a PRISMA Literature Search

Here are a few simple steps to implement the PRISMA literature search in your own work:

  • Research: Search multiple databases, such as PubMed or Scopus, for relevant studies. Make a note of how and where you searched.
  • Study Selection: Review the studies and remove those that don’t fit your criteria. Use the PRISMA diagram to document this process. You’ll need to develop your own selection criteria.
  • Data Extraction: Gather key information from the selected studies, such as sample size, methods, and results. What exactly you extract depends on what you’re investigating.
  • Study Quality Assessment: Assess the quality of the studies to ensure they are reliable.

Example of a Literature Review Using a PRISMA Diagram

To show you how PRISMA works in practice, let’s take a look at a paper that followed the PRISMA guidelines. The systematic review by Helen Crompton and Diane Burke, “Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field,” examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education.

PRISMA Literature Review

The PRISMA guidelines were used in this study to make the process of the systematic review transparent and complete. Here’s a simple explanation of how the PRISMA guidelines were applied:

  • Identification: The researchers conducted a literature search across several databases, identifying 341 relevant studies. Additionally, they conducted a manual search, finding 34 more studies. A manual search means that the researchers independently searched specific journals, reference lists, search engines, and websites in addition to the automated database search to ensure that no relevant studies were overlooked. Four duplicate studies were removed.
  • Screening: After removing duplicates, 371 articles remained. After reviewing the titles and abstracts, no articles were excluded, so all 371 proceeded to full-text screening.
  • Eligibility: The remaining articles were read in full and assessed. Some studies were excluded for the following reasons:
  • No original research (n = 68): These articles were not original studies, but rather reviews or commentaries.
  • Not in the field of higher education (n = 55): Studies were not related to higher education.
  • No artificial intelligence (n = 92): These studies did not deal with AI.
  • No use of AI for educational purposes (n = 18): AI was not used for educational purposes in these studies.
  • Inclusion: Finally, 138 articles were included in the systematic review. These articles were analyzed in detail and qualitatively coded to answer the study’s research questions.

Source: Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22.

You just need to fill out the PRISMA flowchart with the results of your literature search and screening, and you can include it in the methods section of your paper as a figure. Super easy, right?

The PRISMA Checklist

Additionally, PRISMA offers useful resources like a checklist, available on the PRISMA website. This checklist helps ensure that systematic reviews and meta-analyses are reported in a complete and transparent manner. It consists of 27 items, organized into different sections, and serves as a guide to structure your review.

This checklist is particularly relevant if you are preparing a full systematic review for your thesis or paper.

Checklist Summary:
  • Title and Abstract: Clearly state that it is a systematic review. Provide a concise overview of the study.
  • Introduction: Outline the background and reasons for the review. Clearly define the review’s objectives and research questions.
  • Methods: Specify the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the studies. Describe the information sources and search strategies. Explain the selection and data extraction processes. Outline methods for assessing risk of bias and measures of effect. Detail how data from different studies were combined and analyzed.
  • Results: Present the results of the search and selection process, ideally using a flow diagram. Summarize the characteristics and findings of the included studies. Evaluate the risk of bias and the certainty of the results.
  • Discussion: Interpret the findings in the context of other evidence. Address the limitations of the evidence and methods. Consider the implications for practice and future research.
  • Additional Information: Provide details on the registration and protocol of the review. List both financial and non-financial sources of support. Disclose any potential conflicts of interest among the authors. Indicate the availability of data and materials.

While other PRISMA resources may be useful for high-level publications or complex meta-analyses, for your studies, the most relevant parts are the flowchart and sections of the checklist.

If you have any questions, feel free to leave a comment!

Categories
Research Methods

Deductive-Inductive Combination in Thematic Analysis (Tutorial)

Do you want to apply a combination of deductive and inductive thematic analysis in your qualitative research?

Is that even possible, and what should you keep in mind?

In the next few minutes, I’ll show you how to combine deductive and inductive coding, what authors like Braun and Clark, who are the most cited authors on thematic analysis think about it, and how to use this knowledge to perfect your qualitative study.

Inductive and Deductive Category Formation for Qualitative Content Analysis

If you’re familiar with my videos on thematic analysis, you know that this method distinguishes between two types of code and theme formation for analysing qualitative data.

#1 Building Themes Inductively

Here, you derive abstract codes from your data, that is, for example your interview transcripts. As the saying goes, the themes “emerge from the material.” This approach is also often referred to as “bottom-up” coding.

#2 Applying Themes Deductively

In this type of thematic analysis, you create a list of pre-defined themes from a theory or other literature.

Then, you approach the data with these themes in mind and systematically allocate your data to each theme. You can also count how often each theme occurs in your data set.

But what about a deductive-inductive combination? Does this have any advantages.

The answer is: Yes!

Deductive-Inductive Combination for Thematic Analysis

Since thematic analysis was originally invented to be an inductive method, but it’s not always easy to form new codes and themes purely from the ground up, a deductive-inductive combination is often a good way to get the best of both worlds.

Background

Why is this approach useful?

First, pure induction is powerful but difficult. For most research questions, pure induction isn’t the ultimate solution. The problem of induction, which frustrated David Hume and Karl Popper, still persists. Inferring a general rule from a single case is highly problematic. But, even if you are OK with that, it is quite difficult for beginners to confidently develop themes “out of nothing.” At the same time, supervisors often encourage you to read about theories. Incorporating existing theory in inductive research is quite a challenge, and you need a lot of experience to do it correctly.

Second, doing only deductive coding also has significant disadvantages. The theoretical framework you choose to work with is practically predetermined. Deduction doesn’t allow for breaking out of this framework, which means surprising insights that might contradict prior knowledge are not considered. These surprising insights are what make many research projects interesting and can potentially provide greater value for existing theory and literature.

Thus, a combination of both logics can be considered for thematic analysis.

deductive inductive combination

A deductive-inductive thematic analysis

In deductive thematic analysis, you choose your themes based on prior theoretical knowledge to guide the research process. The data is then coded and allocated into this structure (e.g., the main themes). You start with the same thing in your deductive-inductive thematic analysis.

But then, you use surprising findings or data that do not fit these themes to form new, inductive subthemes. If you find a lot, you can even add a main theme to your list of themes.

This can create theoretical added value, contributing something new to the existing knowledge – all while you enjoy the comfort of the theoretical framework you used for the deductive part of the coding.

Example

To better understand how a deductive-inductive combination works in thematic analysis, let’s look at a brief example.

Theory

Assume your study involves Identity Theory. It broadly states that individuals adopt certain characteristics, values, and norms to view themselves as unique compared to others. According to Burke and Stets (1999), three theoretical dimensions are involved in the identity formation process: Investment, Self-esteem, and Rewards.

These three theoretical dimensions could serve as a structure for your thematic analysis. According to deductive logic, three main themes would emerge:

#1 Main Category: Investment in… X (X=your topic)

#2 Main Category: Self-esteem based on… X (X=your topic)

#3 Main Category: Rewards from… X (X=your topic)

You could now structure your material, such as interview passages, according to these three main themes using regular coding techniques.

Now, you could inductively add subthemes by grouping your codes.

Or, based on data that doesn’t fit any of the three main themes, add another main theme based on that “left-over” data.

Data

Imagine you have the following quote in your interview transcript:

“Earlier, I thought I would have to give up my job completely to be a mother. Now I’m more confident that I can do both if I want, or if I want to work part-time or flexibly and arrange childcare without it affecting my career.”

This quote initially falls under Self-esteem, as it deals with self-perception and confidence in overcoming obstacles.

For this quote, you could create the subtheme “self-evaluation of own competencies.” This new subtheme could be placed under the main theme “Self-esteem in … X (X=your topic).”

You might find more quotes that fit into this subtheme, or perhaps quotes that form a completely new main theme – though this is unlikely with a well-established and often-tested theory.

You work inductively through your data until your system of main and subthemes forms a complete picture.

What Braun and Clark Say About the Deductive-Inductive Combination?

The authors of the most cited paper on the method have made clear that the method was originally intended to follow an inductive logic. With their focus on being “reflexive” as a researcher underscores this.

However, it is exactly this what makes qualitative research so flexible. It is not about following a guide from start to finish and never deviate from it. It is about tailoring the analytical approach to your needs and what makes the most sense in your situation.

Therefore, Braun and Clark would agree that combining both logics can be of value if it makes sense in your context.

Outside the Braun and Clark bubble, many researchers see deductive-inductive code formation as a very legitimate way to conduct qualitative research, especially, if you are a beginner.

As I always emphasize, you have the freedom to tailor your approach to your needs, as long as you act systematically and can logically justify your decisions in your methods chapter.

Is Deductive-Inductive the Same as Abductive?

You might have heard of the third type of reasoning: Abduction. This comes into play when you encounter a particularly surprising result and try to explain it with what makes most sense based on the information you have at this point. Then you infer a rule or category that best explains this result. However, this is quite risky as you can’t verify if the rule is correct.

A typical example of abduction is the detective Sherlock Holmes. He looks for clues at the crime scene and abductively infers how the events might have unfolded. These inferences are often very bold but bring him closer to the truth.

However, abduction in qualitative research isn’t really something you can plan systematically. You can’t know if you’ll find surprising results where an abductive inference could help. Here, we can only adopt abduction as a general attitude towards surprising results.

The deductive-inductive method, on the other hand, can be systematically planned and implemented.

Categories
Uncategorized

Social Network Analysis (Introduction & Tutorial)

Social Network Analysis

What is a Social Network Analysis? You’ve probably seen those colorful network graphs in newspaper articles or scientific papers. They look like a lot of work to create, right? Or maybe not?

Actually, you can conduct such an analysis without extensive programming knowledge or expensive software.

If you want to know how to do it – then you should sharpen your pencil and take notes.

In this article, I will explain everything about Social Network Analysis – where it comes from, what it’s good for, and how you can apply it. I will cover these five areas:

  1. Network Theory
  2. Applications of Social Network Analysis
  3. Data Collection
  4. Data Analysis and Visualization
  5. Overview of the Best Software Tools

By the end of this article, you’ll have all the links and further information you need to conduct your first Social Network Analysis.

#1 Network Theory

To understand Social Network Analysis, we first need to be aware of its theoretical basis: Network theory. This theory comes from the mathematical graph theory.

Network theory deals with the relationships between specific objects. In the context of Social Network Analysis, these objects are usually social actors. These relationships and objects are represented using a graph, meaning a diagram that connects (i.e., with lines) two or more objects (i.e., points).

Nodes and Edges

In the vocabulary of Social Network Analysis, an object is called a node (or vertex). The relationship between two or more nodes is represented by edges. These are the lines between the nodes.

A relationship can be either undirected or directed. Let’s imagine our network represents the relationships between Instagram accounts of famous politicians. The nodes are the people, and the edges are the follower relationships.

If Kamala Harris follows Donald Trump, but he does not follow her back, there is a directed edge from Kamala Harris to Donald Trump, usually shown with an arrow. Kamala Harris is the starting node and Donald Trump is the ending node.

If Donald Trump also follows Joe Biden, but not Kamala Harris, Donald Trump is an adjacent node to both Kamala Harris and Joe Biden. However, Joe Biden is not an adjacent node to Kamala Harris.

Centrality Measures

When facing a larger network, you might want to know certain properties of individual nodes or determine which nodes are particularly important or play a specific role in the network.

For this, you can calculate various centrality measures.

Social Network Analysis 2

Density

The density measure helps you to describe a characteristic of the entire network. It indicates how many edges there are in the network relative to the maximum possible number of edges.

For example, it shows how many users in our group of politicians are connected with each other compared to a scenario where everyone is connected with everyone. If all nodes are connected, the density is 1 or 100%. So, you always get a value between 0 and 1 for density.

Degree Centrality

Now let’s look at centrality measures. They do not describe properties of the whole network but single nodes.

This measure indicates how many edges a node has. If Kamala Harris has 9 follower-relationships (regardless in which direction), the degree of her node is 9.

For directed graphs, we distinguish between incoming edges (in-degree) and outgoing edges (out-degree).

Closeness Centrality

This measure indicates the average length of the shortest path between a node and all other nodes. It shows how central a node is within the entire network.

For example, how many contacts must Kamala Harris go through on average to reach certain politicians? The fewer, the more central she is in the network.

Betweenness Centrality

This measure indicates how often a node lies on the shortest path between two other nodes. Nodes with high betweenness centrality often lie between two or more clusters of nodes, essentially forming a bridge between them.

Eigenvector Centrality

This measure indicates how important the neighbors of a node are. The more important neighbors, the higher the value.

The best example of this measure is Google’s PageRank algorithm. It follows the rule that a web page is ranked higher in search results the more other important pages link to it.

So, if I have a blog post on my website and it is linked by major sites like CNN, BBC, and the Forbes, it’s better than if it is linked by two local newspapers and an unknown blogger.

#2 Applications of Social Network Analysis

Social Network Analysis has two main applications. The first is in academic research.

Social Network Analysis in Research

Theoretically, every discipline within the social sciences can use Social Network Analysis. But it goes beyond that. For example, you can also analyze and visualize citation relationships between papers, universities, and scientists.

Social Network Analysis 3
Citation network from Stieglitz et al. (2018)


Most commonly, you’ll find Social Network Analyses in political science, communication studies, and sociology.

Social Network Analysis in Journalism

#3 Data Collection

The basis for conducting any Social Network Analysis is data. In most cases, this data is obtained through web scraping or an API interface (for example of a Social Media platform) when dealing with online research.

If you want to practice, there are plenty of datasets available online for free. You can try Google’s search for datasets, Kaggle, or data.gov.

Data doesn’t always have to be collected automatically. It’s also possible to create small networks by manually entering your data into an Excel sheet or digitizing it in some other way.

For a Social Network Analysis, it is important that the data points reference each other, for example, using an ID for each node that is referenced in any other node that has a connection to that node.

Only then can you calculate centrality measures and visualize a network with software.

#4 Data Analysis and Visualization

Now we come to the analysis. The two most common tools for conducting a Social Network Analysis are R and Gephi.

Both programs can be downloaded and used for free. With R, you’ll need some time to get used to it, as you’ll need to learn or look up the programming language commands.

If you want to avoid programming languages entirely, I’d recommend Gephi. This software has a complete graphical user interface, and you can perform all sorts of tasks related to Social Network Analysis.

It still requires some time to learn Gephi, but there are great tutorials available on YouTube or you can get help in Gephi support groups on Facebook.

A Social Network Analysis with very large datasets requires quite a bit of computing power. To prevent your PC or laptop from reaching its limits and Gephi from crashing, you should filter your data beforehand or use a virtual machine.

The next steps to start your first Social Network Analysis would be:

  1. Read the foundational book on Social Network Analysis by Wasserman & Faust (1994)
  2. Get a free dataset to practice
  3. Watch YouTube tutorials on R or Gephi until you’re an expert
  4. Join Facebook groups where you can ask questions
  5. Learn by doing
  6. And don’t forget: Have fun! 🙂
Categories
Research Methods

Triangulation in Research (Simply Explained)

Triangulation

Have you come across the term triangulation while working on your research paper? You might have a rough idea of what it means, but you’re not entirely sure?

Then sit back and relax.

In this video, I will explain briefly but precisely what triangulation in research is all about. Additionally, I’ll provide you with all four types of triangulation and how you can implement this technique.

This way, you can elevate your qualitative research design to the next level and make your research methodologically robust.

Triangulation (Word Origin)

You can easily derive the meaning of triangulation from Latin. “Tri” means three and “angulus” means angle. So, triangulation involves “measuring in a triangle,” a concept that originates from land surveying.

However, outside of land measurement and geometry, empirical social research has adopted this term. And that’s what we’re focusing on now.

Triangulation in Research

When we talk about triangulation, we are on a methodological level. It’s about how a specific research design can provide as much insight as possible using one or more methods.

While it is commonly associated with qualitative research, it can also be applied in quantitative and mixed methods research.

To avoid confusing you, let’s look at the definition of “triangulation” in the research context from our colleague Flick (2008, p.12):

“Triangulation involves taking different perspectives on a subject under investigation or more generally: when answering research questions. These perspectives can be realized in different methods applied and/or different chosen theoretical approaches, both of which are related to each other.”

The goal of triangulation is to gain deeper insights than would be possible with just a single method or a single theoretical perspective.

Using the metaphor of land surveying, the position of an object can be determined more accurately when viewed from at least two different angles.

4 Types of Triangulation

To help you apply triangulation in your scientific work, here are the four most prominent types (Denzin, 1970; Flick, 2011).

#1 Method Triangulation

This form is probably the most commonly used. Denzin, the father of triangulation, even distinguishes between within-method and between-method triangulation.

Within-method triangulation could involve using two different interview guides to loosen the constraints of methodological decisions when creating the research design.

Between-method triangulation would involve adding a second method as described earlier. In our example, you could distribute an additional online questionnaire to the employees or evaluate the user data of the system.

#2 Data Triangulation

With this approach, you need different data sources. The method can remain the same, as can the phenomenon you are investigating.

To vary the data sources, you can change time, location, and people. There are almost endless possibilities, as you can already triangulate within each of these dimensions.

Time

Let’s take an example. Suppose your method is limited to expert interviews. You conduct interviews in a company and want to accompany the introduction of a new logistics system. You could triangulate within the dimension of “time.”

You select your expert, such as the head of the logistics department. Provided the company agrees, you could conduct an interview with the expert at two or three different points in time.

Here you would gain wonderful insights, for example, into the time before the introduction, the introduction process, and the experiences after the system has been used in the company for some time.

Location

In the same scenario, you could also triangulate the location. You could find two other companies where the system is also being implemented. Then you interview the heads of the logistics departments in these companies.

This way, you can make comparisons and examine the “phenomenon,” whatever you are investigating during the system adaptation, from different perspectives.

Data Subjects

Additionally, and I always recommend this, you can triangulate the data subjects. In addition to the logistics manager, you could include a warehouse specialist and a mid-level manager.

Of course, you can triangulate all three dimensions, but this also increases the effort. Consider which type of data triangulation would provide the most value for answering your research question.

Investigator Triangulation

This type involves briefly switching sides. Two or more researchers can prevent subjective distortions or a so-called “bias” on the part of the researcher.

In our example of expert interviews, at least two interviewers would have to be used. It would not be enough for you to conduct interview 1 and your fellow student interview 2. You would have to do it together, take notes independently, and then compare your evaluations.

This type of triangulation is only really feasible if you work in a group.

Theoretical Triangulation

The last form of triangulation is quite exciting but also not easy for novices like you and me to implement. Before analyzing your data, you must be aware of your theoretical background.

This means which theory you use to understand the data or the phenomenon. Different theories offer different perspectives. In theoretical triangulation, you would apply several different theoretical frameworks to the data and view the phenomenon from different angles.

For example, you could develop a codebook for analyzing your interviews based on a behaviorist theory. Then, analyze your transcript again, this time with a codebook developed using a different sociological or psychological theory. Your imagination is the limit here.

Of course, always provided you argue well.

Triangulation in Research: Validation vs. Balance

To fully understand the concept of triangulation, it’s worth looking at the debate that has been carried out in the research literature over the past few decades.

It was Denzin (1978) who originally proposed triangulation as a strategy for validating research results. His idea was to use an additional method to ensure the accuracy of an analysis. But that this additional method is conducted on a much smaller scale.

This approach, however, has been repeatedly criticized (e.g., Mayring, 2001), leading more and more researchers to argue that different methodological approaches or theoretical perspectives should better be considered equal.

It is also important to understand that the research design in qualitative methods does not always have to be strictly predefined.

Most textbooks suggest a certain approach, with steps you should take, important quality criteria, and so on.

But in qualitative research, it is always possible to deviate from a blueprint if certain circumstances in your research require it.

Triangulation, too, should be understood as an open concept rather than something that needs to follow a strict guideline.

The Difference Between Triangulation and Mixed Methods

If you’re familiar with my article on mixed methods, you might wonder what the big difference is, since different methods are combined there too.

Mixed methods and triangulation are indeed two related concepts within empirical social research. They share similarities, such as the combination of different methods.

But: Mixed methods represent an independent research strategy that explicitly combines quantitative and qualitative methods to benefit from the strengths of both approaches.

Triangulation, on the other hand, is a much broader concept, which not only involves the combination of methods (although it can) but also includes theoretical perspectives and other subjective viewpoints.

Moreover, unlike in mixed methods, you can do what is called “within method” triangulation, which could be a combination of two different qualitative methods.

References

Denzin, N. K. (1978). Triangulation: A Case for Methodological Evaluation and Combination. Sociological Methods, 339-357.

Flick U. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. London, England: Sage.

Flick, U. (2011) Introducing Research Methodology: A Beginner’s Guide to Doing a Research Project. Los Angeles: Sage

Mayring, P. (2001). Combination and Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1).

Categories
Research Methods

Mixed Methods: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research

mixed methods

Are you pondering your research design and have been advised to look into mixed methods research?

Then you’ve come to the right place at the right time.

In the next few minutes, I will provide you with the basics of the mixed methods approach. You’ll learn when it makes sense to combine qualitative and quantitative data and analysis elements. Additionally, you’ll become familiar with the most common methodologies and some helpful foundational texts.

This way, you can quickly decide whether mixed methods are suitable for your work and where to continue your reading on this topic.

The Philosophical Backstory of Mixed Methods (Highly Simplified)

To understand the concept of mixed methods, it’s worth taking a brief look into the philosophy of science.

Epistemology refers to theories of knowledge and describes how researchers can convert reality to knowledge. In short: How is knowledge created?

In today’s research landscape, we can broadly distinguish between two prevailing epistemologies: Positivism and Interpretivism.

These camps have long debated which paradigm is the true one. In specific research disciplines like business studies, sociology, or political science, both camps can be represented.

Some disciplines are so dominated by one camp that the other is rarely recognized. For example, natural sciences are truly positivist – which means that there is only one objective natural world out there, which can be best represented by numbers and maths.

Some social sciences like psychology adopt this view and others are somewhere in the middle. Here, different philosophical stands are accepted and methodologies are followed. These methodologies are classically either qualitative (on the side of interpretivists) or quantitative (on the side of positivists).

Since the social sciences have become much more pluralistic, the combinations of these methodologies has become more common and the advantages of “the other side” are appreciated.

Mixed methods were born!

Definition of Mixed Methods

To speak of mixed methods, a study design must include both qualitative and quantitative methods.

This means that the study design is intentionally developed with this combination in mind, and the research question can only be answered through the combination.

The choice of method or combination should always be closely linked to the research question, research goal, and the context of the research.

The first question you should ask yourself is:

What added value do mixed methods offer compared to a study design with only qualitative or only quantitative methods?

To help you with this, here are some advantages of mixed methods that you can use to justify your study design.

Advantages of Mixed Methods

#1 Mixed Methods can simultaneously answer open and closed research questions

What does that mean?

Through the qualitative part of the study design, you can explore and answer an open research question (e.g., How does an infodemic, a spread of misinformation, propagate on social media?).

With the quantitative part, you can test specific hypotheses (e.g., a warning label indicating unverified third-party information reduces the spread of an infodemic), which helps answer a closed research question.

Additionally, qualitative methods and open research questions often aim at developing new theories (exploratory research), while quantitative methods and closed research questions typically test existing theories (confirmatory research).

#2 Mixed Methods can offset the weaknesses of each method

For example: Qualitative interviews can add depth to a scientific study, but often only a small sample of experts can be interviewed.

If you additionally send a quantitative online survey based on your interview findings to many more people, you achieve the breadth that a purely qualitative study couldn’t provide. This could, for example, increase the statistical generalizability of your findings.

The argument works in reverse as well.

#3 Mixed Methods can yield contradictory results

This might initially sound like a disadvantage. However, it’s not. Contrasting results from both approaches can provide a deeper understanding of the phenomenon and highlight the limitations of each single methodology. This leads to more discussion points and more nuanced results.

Should mixed methods always be used then?

No, of course not. It all depends on the research question, research goal, and context. If your work aims to test existing theory, incorporating qualitative elements might not make much sense.

If you are at the early stages and exploring a topic scarcely covered in existing literature, you might focus on qualitative exploratory research only.

mixed methods 2

Implementing Mixed Methods

When implementing a mixed methods study, you need to be clear about why you are doing it. This will also determine the study design and the chronology of implementation. Here are the three most common variants of mixed methods designs.

#1 Complementation

In this variant, qualitative and quantitative elements are equally prioritized and are intended to provide complementary results on the investigated phenomenon.

Order: Quantitative (50%), then qualitative (50%). Or vice versa.

#2 Completion

In this variant, one of the methods is prioritized and subsequently supported by the other to ensure the phenomenon is fully covered.

Order: Quantitative (90%), then qualitative (10%). Or vice versa.

#3 Sequential Designs

The most common mixed methods studies follow a seuqential design. This means you complete one method first, and then start with the other.

Explorative sequential design

A qualitative study is used to develop constructs or hypotheses, which are then tested with a quantitative study.

Order: Qualitative (exploration), then quantitative (testing).

Explanatory sequential design

First, A quantitative study is used to test hypothesis. Second, a qualitative study follows to understand “why” these results occured.

Order: Quantitative (explanation), then qualitative (understanding).

#4 Parallel Designs

The alternative to a sequential design is a parallel mixed methods design. Here, you conduct multiple methods at the same time.

In this case, the second study does not build on the results of the first, but instead, the results of both studies are compared and contrasted once they are completed.

Validating Results

For mixed methods research, validating the results is an important quality criterion.

For quantitative data, there are well-standardized calculations (e.g., Cronbach’s Alpha) that can validate constructs using SPSS or similar programs.

For qualitative data, the validation process is much softer, and there is less consensus on the standard. Leung (2015) suggests these five criteria:

  • Does the research question align with the analysis results?
  • Is the chosen methodology suitable for answering the research question?
  • Does the research design match the methodology?
  • Is the sample appropriate for studying the phenomenon?
  • Do the results and conclusions fit the sample and the research context?

You basically apply the same techniques to ensure validity and reliability as you would for just one method (Venkatesh et al., 2013). Now you do it for two. This is why mixed methods often means more workload, but in the end, you also have a more valuable study.

What is the difference between mixed methods and Triangulation?

In mixed methods, your qualitative and quantitative parts are typically treated equally. If one method is only worth 10% or so, then you can speak of triangulation.

The purpose of triangulation is to provide additional perspectives to the object under study, for example by adding additional researchers, another theoretical perspective, or addition data that is all different from the main study.

Mixed methods is highly respected because it has some aspects of triangulation already built-in. However, you can also perform triangulation without using quantitative and qualitative elements. Therefore, mixed methods and triangulation are related concepts but not the same!

What to read next?

If you now want to deepen your understanding, I suggest you get your hands on a copy of Creswell and Clark’s “Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research” (2010).

It is one of the standard methods book on this topic and it is applicable for any social science discipline!

Categories
Scientific Writing

How to Write a Peer Review Report (Real Example)

Are you curious about how to write a peer review report?

Grab your note-taking app and pay close attention.

In this article, I’ll walk you through 7 simple steps to structure your peer review report and highlight what you need to consider. I’ll also provide examples from my own reviews, which you can adapt for your use.

What is a Peer Review?

A peer review is an anonymous evaluation report on an academic paper. Writing reviews is a routine part of research work.

Peer review processes are also sometimes simulated in university seminars as graded assignments. Writing a peer review is a crucial skill for academics; let’s explore how to do it effectively.

writing a peer review

Step 1: Overview

In the academic world, it’s customary to thank the editors for the opportunity to write a review. You can also start your peer review report with a brief summary.

“Thank you for the opportunity to review this submission. The paper, ‘Virtual Reality in Digital Education: A Network Affordance Perspective on Effective Use,’ aims to enhance our understanding of using immersive technologies in digital learning environments. It reports the results of an interview study and develops a theoretical framework to help educators integrate Virtual Reality into their curriculum.”

Step 2: Your Expertise

Next, it’s essential to note that a review is always anonymous. The authors, and especially the editors who summarize the reviews, should know about your expertise in the specific research topic.

Dedicate 1-2 sentences to describe your background in this area. You can also briefly mention how you will structure your review.

“I commend the authors for their successful paper and the results of an interesting empirical study. Having contributed to several studies in Virtual Reality myself, I consider my expertise significant. However, as I primarily use quantitative methods, I will focus less on methodology in this review and ask the editors to consider other reviewers’ opinions on this aspect. To provide the most useful feedback for improving this paper, I have divided my review into three main areas of critique.”

Step 3: Main Sections of Your Peer Review Report

There are two ways to structure the main body of your review. You can go chronologically through the paper and provide feedback on each section (introduction, literature review, results, etc.). However, this is not the approach that real professionals use, so you shouldn’t start with it.

In learning how to write a peer review, I recommend using your major points of criticism as structuring elements. For example:

#1 Theoretical Motivation of the Study

#2 Lack of Transparency in Method Description

#3 Missing Theoretical Contribution
…”

You may have 5 or 6 main points, but no more. These should be equally weighted. Write a similar amount for each main point.

writing a peer review 2

Step 4: Constructive Criticism

In your critique, it’s essential to consider three things:

  1. Positives For each main point, start by mentioning what you liked. When writing reviews, it’s easy to drift into very harsh criticism. Imagine how hard it can be for the authors, who have put a lot of work into their paper.
  2. Negatives Then, bring up your criticism, but remain objective. Specify the parts of the text you had issues with, so the authors can quickly find and revise them.
  3. Suggestions for Improvement This is the most crucial part. The quality of a review is determined by how constructive its improvement suggestions are. Provide as many specific suggestions for each point of criticism as you can. Recommend literature, better arguments, or methodological approaches that you know but found lacking in the paper.

Step 5: Minor Points

These are less dramatic points but caught your attention while reading. They can be linguistic inconsistencies or citation errors. Create a small list of these points and indicate the pages.

“Here are some additional points:

  • ‘affect’ should be ‘effect’ (p.2)
  • ‘their’ should be ‘there’ (p.3)
  • The direct quote on p.4 lacks a page number

If there are too many minor errors, you don’t need to list them all. You’re not a proofreader, but a reviewer. Make a general comment like:

“There are numerous minor errors throughout the manuscript. A professional proofreading service should address these.”

Step 6: References

Yes, you heard right. A truly professional review includes a short reference list. Here, you list all sources you cited to support your critique or recommended to the authors. This small but significant detail elevates a mediocre review to a very good one.

This makes it as easy as possible for the authors to address your critique. They can read the sources you cited and tackle the points you raised. This can be a general guideline when writing reviews: Make it as easy as possible for the authors to implement your suggestions!

Whoever reviews YOUR review will be impressed!

writing a peer review 3

Step 7: The Recommendation

Finally, you need to make a decision. What is your recommendation? Should the submission be rejected? Or should it proceed to the next round (major/minor revisions)? Or can it be accepted immediately?

Your recommendation should ideally not be directly in your review text. This makes it easier for the person summarizing all reviews. As a reviewer, you make a recommendation, but the final decision is not yours. If you recommend rejection, but all other reviewers disagree, your critique still needs to be addressed.

A concluding section might look like this:

“In summary, this paper addresses an interesting case for implementing Virtual Reality in digital education. Unfortunately, in its current state, it shows fundamental weaknesses, such as in theoretical motivation, transparency in methodological implementation, and theoretical contribution. I hope my critique helps the authors improve their work and find something useful in this review. Best of luck in developing this study further.”

As you can see, the recommendation is not mentioned in the text. The conclusion could lead to either revision or rejection. A good review is characterized by not pre-empting this decision.

Now that you have all the essentials, you are ready to start writing a peer review with confidence and precision. Understanding how to write a peer review ensures that your feedback is both constructive and helpful, guiding the authors toward improving their work.

Categories
Uncategorized

How to Overcome your Phone Addiction: 7 Strategies to Stay Focused

Are you trying to overcome your phone addiction but don’t know how?

In this article, I’ll share 7 strategies that have personally helped me keep my smartphone addiction under control.

This way, you can take your productivity to a new level, maintain a genuine connection with the people you love, and finally clear the fog in your mind.

Understand the Root Causes of Your Smartphone Addiction

How often do you look at your smartphone without really knowing why? Whether it’s during a lecture, waiting for the bus, or dining with friends – it seems we can hardly do without it. Just checking the phone quickly? And suddenly, we’re deep in the Instagram spiral or lost in an endless stream of TikTok videos. Why do we do this?

In this article, I’ll show you what’s behind our “smartphone addiction” and how we can be smarter than our smartphones. Are you ready to take back control?

Step 1 towards improvement would be to ask yourself: Why is it so hard for you to put the smartphone aside?

smartphone Addiction

#1 App Development

Behind the scenes, developers know exactly what they are doing. They design apps and social media not only to capture our attention temporarily but to keep us engaged for the long term. Endless feeds that never end and push notifications that keep bringing us back are no coincidence. They are part of a clever strategy to keep us in their apps as long as possible.

#2 Dopamine

On a neurobiological level, this can also be explained. Dopamine plays a key role. This neurotransmitter is released when we receive positive feedback – whether it’s a new message, a like, or another notification. And that’s exactly what keeps us glued to the screen. Imagine your own “Feel-Good Dealer” rewarding you with a sense of happiness. These little reward kicks are like candy for your brain, constantly luring you back to the screen.

#3 Instant Gratification

The phenomenon of instant gratification, a craving for immediate rewards, is another reason why it’s hard to put the smartphone away. Especially in moments of boredom, we automatically reach for the phone. It appears to be the easiest solution to fill that void. However, the instant gratification that smartphones provide can quickly become a habit that is hard to break.

smartphone Addiction 2

#4 FOMO

Another psychological driver for constant smartphone use is the phenomenon of FOMO. Do you know the feeling? This nagging fear that you might miss out on something if you’re not constantly checking your phone? That’s the “Fear of Missing Out.”

Social networks like Instagram and TikTok amplify this fear by bombarding us with endless updates about the supposedly exciting lives of others. This constant worry about not being up-to-date drives us to compulsively check our smartphones. But the catch is: FOMO is never truly satisfied. Every new video, every new post only confirms that life goes on without us and we might be missing out even more.

# 2 Recognize the Negative Effects of of Your Smartphone Addiction

#1 Desensitization of the Reward System

Dopamine plays a big role. The substance responsible for feelings of happiness. You might wonder what’s bad about that? Well, like many things in life, too much dopamine can be problematic.

If the brain is regularly and abundantly exposed to dopamine, as is the case with constant smartphone use, desensitization can occur. This means that the dopamine receptors in the brain become less sensitive. So, you need stronger or more frequent stimuli to feel the same reward. This can lead to everyday pleasures and interactions becoming less satisfying in the long run.

smartphone Addiction 3

#2 Increased Stress Levels

Too much dopamine can also lead to a permanent state of stress, as dopamine also affects stress regulation. Your body is then constantly on alert, which can lead to anxiety, sleep problems, and even high blood pressure.

Imagine your brain as an inbox that’s constantly flooded with emails – from messages to games to app updates, the smartphone never stops pinging. It’s no wonder that our brains eventually become overwhelmed and overloaded with stimuli. This information overload can lead to brain fatigue and further increase stress levels.

#3 Impairment of Cognitive Functions

Over time, overstimulation by dopamine can negatively affect your cognitive abilities. If your brain is constantly seeking quick rewards, it can impair your concentration. Studies even show that excessive smartphone use can affect productivity. So, if you ever feel like you’re getting nothing done, banish your phone from the room.

An excess of dopamine can also make you more impulsive and make it harder to control your emotions. This can lead to friction in everyday life and negatively affect your relationships.

And that’s interesting because I’ve often noticed how smartphones change social interactions. For example, when I meet friends and my phone is on the table, I’m much less attentive. It’s a completely different conversation when I leave my smartphone in another room. Although smartphones should theoretically bring us closer together, they often lead to physical and emotional distance between us and our fellow human beings.

3. Set a Clear Goal to Combat Your Smartphone Addiction

Sure, you could try to completely abstain from digital devices, but realistically, that would be quite limiting. Because, of course, smartphones also have their good sides. They not only keep us connected with friends and family but are also real lifesavers in studies or work. Thanks to emails, calendars, and a flood of apps, our lives remain organized, and we stay informed.

It’s not about banning all digital devices but about making conscious decisions about their use. Who’s in control? Is it your phone, or are you using it as a tool that enriches your life? Ask yourself: What are my values? What do I want to achieve? Does using app XY align with these goals, or is it merely a distraction? By asking such questions, you can ensure that your technology use supports your goals rather than hindering them.

smartphone Addiction 4

4. Discover Healthier Sources of Dopamine

While smartphones often only provide short moments of happiness (and can have negative effects), there are alternatives that release dopamine more slowly and sustainably – and these are usually much more fulfilling. Here are some suggestions for how you can increase your well-being in the long term and fight smartphone addiction:

Setting and achieving goals:

Setting goals is more than just a good intention. Because each small success releases dopamine, significantly boosting your confidence. Whether you’re rocking your next term paper, achieving a sports goal, or just meditating more regularly – each step towards your goal brings you more inner satisfaction.

Spending time with friends:

Genuine interactions, such as relaxed dinners, spontaneous outings, or deep conversations, are particularly effective at fulfilling your need for human connection.

Learning new skills:

Learning a new skill challenges your brain and expands your perspective. Whether you’re learning a new language, a musical instrument, or knitting – the success of your learning process also releases dopamine. This is a meaningful alternative to the often empty entertainment that constant scrolling on the smartphone offers.

5. Implement a Digital Detox Routine

“Digital Detox” – that is, a conscious break from all digital devices – can be an effective method to reduce overstimulation and improve your mental well-being.

By temporarily abstaining from smartphones, tablets, and computers, you give your brain a chance to recover from the constant stimulus overload. This can improve concentration, enhance sleep, and reduce your stress levels.

A successful digital detox starts with small steps: Perhaps just an evening or a weekend without digital devices. It’s important to use these times consciously to engage in activities that you enjoy and that ground you – whether it’s reading a book, spending time in nature, or just enjoying the quiet.

These digital breaks can help you reflect on your own use of technology and overcome smartphone addiction.

However, digital detox phases, like a day offline or a week without social media, often do not lead to lasting changes. Consider it more of a reset. Although they provide a break, they don’t tackle the underlying habits that lead to our dependency. Without a real change in our daily routines and our attitude towards technology, we quickly fall back into old patterns.

6. Gradually Change Your Daily Habits

Create smartphone-free zones: Decide where and when the smartphone is off-limits. This could be during dinner, on a walk, or at a concert. These moments without a smartphone help you enjoy the experience more intensely.

Monitor your screen time: To reduce our dependency on smartphones, we need to set clear boundaries and make more conscious decisions about when and how we use our devices. Screen time monitoring apps can help you manage your time more consciously.

Restructure your daily routine: Rely on a real alarm clock instead of your phone to wake you up. This way, you’re not tempted to spend the first minutes of your day on the smartphone. Ideally, banish your phone from the bedroom altogether. If you want to know the time during the day, it’s best to rely on a clock.

Regulate your notifications: Turn off unnecessary push notifications and organize your apps into folders. This way, you’re less likely to automatically reach for your smartphone and can decide for yourself when you want to view messages and updates.

Remove distractions: Leave your smartphone in another room when you need to concentrate. This way, you work more productively.
Consciously use breaks: Try not to reach for your smartphone at every opportunity. Use waiting times instead to observe your surroundings or simply think. Such breaks can foster your creativity.

7. Adopt a Critical Perspective on Smartphone Use

Let’s be honest: It’s high time to rethink your relationship with your smartphone. I invite you to take a close look at how and why you use your smartphone and consider if there might be a better way.

Start with small steps and see for yourself how your life and well-being gradually improve. Are you ready to take on this challenge? Because remember – your smartphone should be a tool, not the center of your life.

Categories
Uncategorized

Study 3x More Effectively with Mind Maps (Picture Superiority Effect)

studying with mind maps 1

Goodbye, flashcards! It’s time to learn in a way that your brain will adore. Studying with mind maps will give you a turbo boost. In this article, I’ll reveal why mind maps are a real game-changer and provide you with 3 techniques to get started.

What are Mind Maps?

Imagine if your brain could speak and sketch its thoughts on paper. The result? A mind map! Mind maps are visual diagrams that organize ideas, words, tasks, or other concepts around a central theme.

They use colors, symbols, and connections to mimic the way our brain processes information. This method was popularized in the 1970s by psychologist Tony Buzan.

In German-speaking regions, the coach and author Vera Birkenbihl also advocated for mind maps as a learning method.

Why Studying with Mind Maps is So Effective

#1 They Mirror the Brain’s Way of Working

Why are mind maps so helpful? The answer lies in how our brain functions. Rather than the dry memorization of linear lists or long blocks of text, our brain prefers to structure information in a networked way, relating different pieces of data.

Mind maps do just that: they start with a central theme and branch out into related areas, similar to how our brain networks information. This method mirrors the natural way we think and learn, thus facilitating the understanding and retention of information.

#2 Visual Stimuli Enhance Memory

Visual stimuli play a crucial role in learning. Images, symbols, and colors are recognized and remembered by our brain faster and more easily than text. Mind maps leverage this so-called picture superiority effect by presenting complex information in a visually appealing and easily understandable form.

When studying with mind maps, integrate not only words and bullet points but also small sketches or symbols into your mind maps. This strategy helps not just to process the learning material better but also to retain it long-term.

studying with mind maps 2

#3 Active Learning Instead of Passive Reception

Mind maps transform learning into an active experience. Instead of just absorbing information, they encourage you to actively think through the material, organize it, and convert it into a mind map.

While designing a mind map, you’ll discover how different concepts are interconnected. This process strengthens your critical thinking and your ability to organize complex information and place it into a broader context.

By visualizing connections between different topics in your mind map, you deepen your understanding and make it tangible.

To understand why active learning is far superior to passive learning, you can also check out my tutorial on Active Recall.

#4 Targeted Summarization of Complex Topics with Mind Maps

Mind maps allow you to condense complex subjects and extensive content to the essentials and structure them clearly. Instead of flipping through endless pages of notes, they enable you to quickly dive into the main ideas and key concepts. I have always preferred using mind maps when I needed an overview of a subject area or was preparing a presentation. This way, I always maintained a focus on the bigger picture and structure.

#5 Improved Time Management

Creating mind maps enhances your time management. Thanks to their visual layout, you can easily set priorities, organize your learning objectives, and keep track of your progress. Mind maps serve as visual learning plans. At a glance, you can see which areas have been covered and where there are gaps.

3 Techniques

There are many techniques to elevate your learning with mind maps to the next level. As I mentioned, British psychologist Tony Buzan popularized the mind map in the 1970s. Let’s take a look at his method.

The Buzan Technique

The Buzan technique is based on five central principles that together form the foundation of every effective mind map:

  1. Start with a Central Topic: Each mind map begins with a single concept placed in the center of your page. This could be the title of your course, the theme of a project, or simply an idea you want to explore.
  2. Branches for Main Ideas: From this central topic, you draw branches to the main points or key ideas associated with it. These branches should be large enough to later add sub-ideas.
  3. Sub-branches for Details: Each main branch can have further branches that contain details, examples, evidence, or other relevant information. The deeper you go, the more specific the information becomes.
  4. Use Keywords and Images: A single word or image can often represent a complex idea or concept. Buzan recommends using keywords and images wherever possible to make your thoughts more efficient and enhance your memory.
  5. Connections and Links: Draw lines or arrows to show connections between different parts of your mind map. This helps you see how ideas are interconnected and fosters a deeper understanding of the subject.
studying with mind maps 3

Additional Techniques

The original method developed by Tony Buzan has since been expanded and adapted for various purposes.

For instance, there is the Rico Cluster by Dr. Gabrielle Rico. Here, you link your ideas as a network rather than starting from a central key concept. This is intended to support the normal communication between the right and left hemispheres of the brain.

The previously mentioned Vera F. Birkenbihl worked with her KAWA method. A KAWA is created when you find associations for the initial letters of your starting word. To better understand, let’s create a KAWA on the topic of Marketing.

  • M – Market Research
  • A – Audience Analysis
  • R – Rebranding
  • K – Customer Retention
  • E – Engagement in Social Media
  • T – Testimonials from Customers
  • I – Influencer Marketing
  • N – Neuromarketing
  • G – Contests and Promotions

This method is particularly helpful for brainstorming. Are you still looking for a topic for your next term paper? Using the KAWA method, you can generate additional ideas.

I believe that there isn’t ONE correct method. You need to find out for yourself what works best for you.

After all, each mind map reflects YOUR thought processes. The more you stick to a step-by-step guide, the more it may constrain your own thoughts. I recommend just getting started and experimenting.

Studying with Mind Maps: How to Become a Pro

Remember, your mind map is not fixed. Rather, it accompanies you during your learning process and allows you to be flexible.

As you absorb new information or come up with new ideas, whether through reading, listening, or discussing, you can gradually expand your mind map.

It’s important that your mind map remains dynamic and evolves with your understanding and thoughts. However, you should ensure that it doesn’t become too cluttered and that you maintain focus.

Whenever I wanted to learn a topic, I always liked to start with a mind map to keep an overview, and then created additional mind maps related to relevant companies or topics.

In the end, I didn’t have just one mind map, but perhaps eight different ones. These represented my natural thought processes much better than flashcards or linear notes could.

For exam preparation, you could use questions as the central point of a mind map. For example: “How can companies use the concept of ‘Customer Lifetime Value’ to build long-term customer relationships and increase revenue?”

Around this central question, a mind map can be built. This approach ensures that you’re not just memorizing a text answer, but gradually expanding your thoughts, discovering new connections, and developing a deeper understanding of the topic.

Digital Mind Map Tools vs. Old-School Mind Mapping on Paper

Okay, but should you now use digital mind map tools or create your mind map old-school with paper and pen?

Digital Tools for Creating Mind Maps

Welcome to the digital age of mind maps! With tools like MindNode, XMind, Coggle, and even ChatGPT, you can incorporate multimedia content into your mind maps. Whether it’s images, links, videos, or documents—all these can help make your mind map vibrant and informative. This is especially useful if you are a visual learner or want to use your mind map as the basis for a presentation.

Many digital mind map tools offer features for real-time collaboration. This means you and any team members can work on the same mind map simultaneously, no matter where you are.

This is a game-changer for group projects and joint learning sessions! Plus, your mind maps are less likely to get lost in a pile of papers since everything is stored digitally.

studying with mind maps shribe

Old-School Mind Mapping

And yet… sometimes less is more. There’s something satisfying about bringing your ideas to life directly with pen on paper and visualizing your thought processes.

This method fosters creativity and can help you process information better. No distractions from notifications or dead batteries—just you and your thoughts.

Additionally, with old-school mind mapping on paper, you have complete freedom in design. You’re not confined to the structures or designs of software, and you can make your mind maps as simple or complex as you like.

It’s all about what works for you. You might even find that a mix of both—digital for university projects and paper for your personal brainstorming sessions—is the best solution for you.

Experiment a bit and find your own way to make the most out of studying with mind maps for yourself.

The goal is to feel organized and enjoy learning. So, grab your pen or tablet and give it a try.